Cases 21 - 30 of 2,911
Garcia-Perez v. Guerra
as 24-40128
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
J. E. "Eddie" Guerra, Sheriff, Jose R. Vasquez, Captain, David Flores, First Lieutenant and others
Flores v. Nassau County Sheriff's Dept.
as 2:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Mr. Christopher Flores
Defendant:
Nassau County Sherrifs Dept. and Nassau County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores, Jr. v. USA
as 2:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jesus Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BENITEZ-FLORES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS BENITEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FLORES v. PUGH et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FLORES
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHAD PUGH, AUSTIN LEE ALLIGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Flores, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Ryan Florres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Daniels et al
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Adrian Flores
Defendant:
J.A. Daniels and Richlands Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Flores v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Felix Nacedo Flores
Respondent:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aburto v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
Erik Flores Aburto
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Flores v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Saveedra Flores
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
