Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Schorovsky v. Green et al
as 7:2016cv00033
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Ablos, FNU Caswell, FNU Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Robert George Schorovsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schorovsky v. Green et al
as 5:2016cv00068
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Ablos, FNU Caswell, FNU Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Robert George Schorovsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Miller et al
as 5:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Adrian DesJuan Bishop
Defendant:
Chad Miller, FNU Wesson, FNU Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Kalinski et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Petitioner:
Marcus Antoine Wilson
Respondent:
FNU Kalinski, FNU Wolf, FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Samuels et al
as 5:2012cv00659
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wiggins
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Helen T Marbury, N. Ortezs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Munnerlyn et al
as 5:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jackson
Defendant:
FNU Munnerlyn, FNU Rosario, FNU Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rafaniello et al
as 5:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jackson
Defendant:
A. L. Rafaniello, FNU Bateman, FNU Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling v. City of Hayward et al
as 3:2012cv02927
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sterling
Defendant:
City of Hayward, Diane Urban, Fnu Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Robert Rosales
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, TDCJ Board of Pardons and Paroles, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Haynes et al
as 2:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Russell Robinson
Defendant:
Anthony Haynes, William Taylor, Jr., Jeff Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Prisoner Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
