Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Washington v. Beaumont Bone & Joint et al
as 1:2026cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Defendant:
Beaumont Bone & Joint, Oscar Currie, A. Lynd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crowe v. McFadden et al
as 3:2025cv00717
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
FNU Canty, FNU White, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redina v. Franks et al
as 1:2025cv01223
Defendant:
FNU Franks, Chief FNU White, Sgt FNU Jefferies and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rendina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Suttles et al
as 5:2025cv00036
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jamar Walker
Defendant:
FNU Suttles, FNU Moss, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee (ID 113662) v. Austin et al
as 5:2025cv03015
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alexander McGee
Defendant:
(fnu) Austin, (fnu) Frank and (fnu) McCullough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barris v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv00443
Defendant:
FNU Parr, FNU Young, Unknown Wellpath Medical Contract Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Lemay Barris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beckham v. Frank et al
as 3:2024cv00842
Defendant:
FNU Maxiey, FNU Kerns, FNU Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Dayshawn Beckham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. FNU Frank
as 24-10549
Defendant:
FNU Cosby, Warden, Robertson Unit Staff and FNU Frank, Officer
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack
Kelly v. Stephens et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Randy Kelly
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Nabors and FNU Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
