Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Connall v. Basel, et al.
as 1:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Paul J Connall
Defendant:
Yvonne Basel, FNU Lewis and FNU Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connall v. Basel et al
as 1:2022cv01316
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Connall
Defendant:
Yvonne Basel, FNU Lewis, FNU Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monk v. Massey et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, FNU Vonn, FNU Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical, FNU Phipps, FNU Hillhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Taylor, et al
as 21-6014
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT FNU HENDERSHOT, SGT. FNU HANSON, LIEUTENANT FNU CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ALEXANDER PARKS
Lonon v. Vaugh et al
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Cert Officer FNU Smtih, Lt. FNU Neal, Cert Officer FNU Davis and others
Plaintiff:
China Lonon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Taylor, et al
as 20-6054
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT FNU HENDERSHOT, SERGEANT FNU HANSON, LIEUTENANT FNU CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ALEXANDER PARKS
Fair v. Lincoln County et al
as 5:2020cv00027
Plaintiff:
Michael Odell Fair
Defendant:
Lincoln County Sheriff Department, FNU Neal and Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
