Cases 31 - 40 of 176
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mitchell v. Kendall
as 23-11035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William L. Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Kendall, III, Secretary of the Air Force
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yarbrough v. The United States Space Force, et al.
as 4:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jace Yarbrough
Defendant:
The United States Space Force, The United States Department of the Air Force, The Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clark v. Kendall, III
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Clark
Defendant:
Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JEFFERSON v. KENDALL
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Garrett Jefferson
Defendant:
HONORABLE FRANK KENDALL, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE and Honorable FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jamie Brown v. Frank Kendall
as 23-6840
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMIE L. BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force and THOMAS SHUBERT, President, Air Force Clemency and Parole Board
Thomas Coleman v. Frank Kendall, III
as 23-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas G. Coleman, Major, USAF (ret.)
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Kendall, III, The Honorable, Secretary of the Air Force
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
