Cases 71 - 80 of 7,803
Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
William Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glafiro Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Glafiro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Warden USP Lompoc, Assistant Warden USP Lompoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (PS) v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00614
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Bianca M Sanchez
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Terrell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1079
Petitioner:
BROOKS TERRELL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Herrera v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv10544
Petitioner:
Clacy Watson Herrera
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Eric Rardin
Bishop v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Montez Lisha Bishop and Montez Lesha Bishop
Defendant:
Jimmy Bennett, Scott Beard, Richard Kennedy and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Key v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
DAJUAN KEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, named as in their Individual and Official Capacity(ies)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1072
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. COSBY
Defendant:
A CIOLLI, Warden ADX, BILL TRUE, Former Warden, AWS PROGRAMS COMPLEX and others
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Florence High
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
