Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Gassew v. Cutillar
as 1:2022cv11621
Plaintiff:
John Gassew
Defendant:
Dr Dean Cutillar and Federal Medical Center Devens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Devens Federal Medical Center
as 1:2021cv12040
Plaintiff:
Sean Jenkins
Defendant:
Devens Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hulsey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv11078
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Fort Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Olin Dale Hulsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bureau Of Prisions et al
as 4:2020cv40059
Respondent:
Devens Warden, Federal Medical Center, Bureau Of Prisions and others
Petitioner:
Albert L. Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parra Reyes v. RADM Spaulding Federal Medical Center Devens, MA
as 1:2020cv10793
Defendant:
RADM Spaulding Federal Medical Center Devens, MA
Plaintiff:
Walis Parra Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivera v. RADM Spaulding Federal Medical Center Devens, MA
as 1:2020cv10776
Petitioner:
Pablo M Rivera
Respondent:
RADM Spaulding Federal Medical Center Devens, MA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stovall v. Federal Medical Center at Devens et al
as 1:2019cv11117
Defendant:
Stephen Spaulding, Psychology and Psychiatric Staff and Federal Medical Center at Devens
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sinkfield v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv10776
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Devens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locascio v. Spaulding
as 19-1033
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN S. SPAULDING, Federal Medical Center, Devens
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK LOCASCIO
Warner v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2018cv10850
Petitioner:
Luke Jospeh Warner
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding, Berhan Yeh, Federal Medical Center Devens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
