Cases 1 - 10 of 2,341
Frey v. City of Pocatello et al
as 4:2024cv00582
Defendant:
Officer Br Johnson, Officer R Hurley, I-XX DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Aspen Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barbee v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv01921
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, J. Ferro, Craig Molina and others
Plaintiff:
Tianne Barbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Moira Ringo, et al
as 24-2869
Defendant:
EMERGENT GAME TECHNOLOGIES, TALECRIS BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC, SIGNALSCAPE INC and others
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Clark, D. Southworth, Ferro and others
Plaintiff:
Jayon Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ferro v. Sauser et al
as 8:2024cv02070
Defendant:
Paul Sauser and Peggy Sauser
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Ferro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cowart, et al. v. Davis, et al.
as 24-5123
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. WIRTH, ANSELL JORDAN, JOSEPH COWART and others
Defendant:
TARA CARPENTER, RICHARD SNYDER, KIM THOMAS and others
Daniel Seegmiller et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv06823
Defendant:
BWDAC, Inc., Larsen Foundry Supply Corporation, RT Vanderbilt and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Seegmiller and Daniel Seegmiller
Petitioner:
John Crane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
