Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,202
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Petrosaurus, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00936
Plaintiff: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant: Petrosaurus, Inc., Alexander Cohen, Scott Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ALSTOM SIGNALING INC. v. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC. et al
as 3:2022cv05171
Plaintiff: ALSTOM SIGNALING INC.
Defendant: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC., FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc. v. TDX Quality, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: TDX Quality, LLC and Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America v. Bethel Federal - Unit JV et al
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of Superior Group, Inc., d/b/a Superior Group, Inc., an Alaskan corporation doing business as Superior Plumbing and Heating
Defendant: Bethel Federal - Unit JV, Bethel Federal Services, LLC, Unit Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01061
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Martinez Services, Inc. dba Martinez Construction Services, Martinez Services, Inc. dba Martinez Construction Services, United States of America and others
Defendant: Advanced Technology Construction Corporation, Zurich American Insurance Company, the parent company of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the Use and Benefit of Relyant Global, LLC v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF RELYANT GLOBAL, LLC and Relyant Global, LLC
Defendant: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Zurich American Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Baker Roofing Company v. Walbridge Aldinger LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00330
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. and Baker Roofing Company
Defendant: Walbridge Aldinger LLC, Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Waiea Management Development Company, LLC v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff: Waiea Management Development Company, LLC
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF ESA SOUTH INC v. CH2M HILL CONSTRUCTORS INC ET AL
as 3:2022cv07944
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of ESA SOUTH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION
Defendant: CH2M HILL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., a Colorado Corporation, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Zurich American Insurance et al v. Cottonwood Residential O.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022mc00383
Petitioner: Zurich American Insurance and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Respondent: Cottonwood Residential O.P., Cottonwood Residential II and Cottonwood Sugarmont

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?