Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Kennington v. Fifth Third Bank
as 4:2019cv02135
Plaintiff:
Susan Kennington
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Call et al
as 1:2019cv01274
Defendant:
City of North Ridgeville Ohio, Edith M. Call, Mr. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Badeen et al v. PAR, INC. d/b/a PAR North America et al
as 2:2019cv10532
Plaintiff:
Midwest Recovery and Adjustment, Inc. and George badeen
Defendant:
Renovo Services, LLC, Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ina Group, LLC. v. Patel et al
as 1:2018cv00733
Defendant:
Taraben N. Patel, Natubhai S. Patel, Denise Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Ina Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matt v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Meagan G. Matt
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fornesa, Jr. et al v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 4:2017cv02728
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Fornesa and Ricardo Fornesa, Jr.
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank and Fifth Third Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Fornesa, et al v. Fifth Third Mortgage Company
as 17-20324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY FORNESA and RICARDO FORNESA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY, also known as Fifth Third Bank
Mark Fornesa v. Fifth Third Mortgage Company
as 17-20324
Defendant / Appellee:
Fifth Third Mortgage Company, also known as Fifth Third Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Anthony Fornesa and Ricardo Fornesa, Jr.
United States of America v. Roemke et al
as 1:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Roemke, Tonia R Roemke, Richard C Roemke and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Penfold v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Penfold and Edwin D. Penfold
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
