Cases 11 - 20 of 439
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 8:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 0:2023cv02653
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Susan Davenport, et al v. City of Little Rock, et al
as 23-2834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Susan Davenport, Chris Davenport, Lloyd St. Clair and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Little Rock, A Municipality, Kenton Buckner, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Police Chief, Amber Kalmer, Individually and others
Johnson v. Does
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Floyd Johnson
Defendant:
Does Commissary Worker, ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Malone, Sr. v. Does, et al
as 23-2387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Dewayne Malone, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Officer Jaimie, Robert Case, Jail Administrator, Greene County, Steve Franks, Sheriff, Greene County and others
United States v. Lucas Floyd
as 23-2090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lucas Frank Floyd
Kinard et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Brian Kinard, Laywood Molette, Jonathan Overfelt and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Guthrie v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
George Dwayne Guthrie, II
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Brad Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nail v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nail
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Brad Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
