Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mia Fontaine v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Mia Fontaine
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fontaine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv01100
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
William Charles Fontaine, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fontaine v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00275
Plaintiff:
Larae A. Fontaine
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Fontaine-Sharp v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00840
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lynn Fontaine-Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
De La Fontaine v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00744
Plaintiff:
Titus De La Fontaine
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
FONTAINE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00402
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEON FONTAINE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fontaine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv02662
Plaintiff:
Lee R. Fontaine, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Simpson v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02222
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Fontaine Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FONTAINE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
MARY A FONTAINE
Defendant:
SCOTT HOCH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FONTAINE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARY A FONTAINE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
