Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 112
Shyheim El-Mu'min v. Matthew Newman, et al
as 19-3393
Defendant: J. Gobal, Major, Clinton Hyde, CO I, Robert Jameson, CO I and others
Defendant / Appellee: Paul Schofield, Sergeant, Noel Maduka Obi, Correctional Case Manager, Matthew Newman, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Shyheim Deen El-Mu'min, also known as James I. Lenoir
Eric Watkins v. Three Admin Remedy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-40869
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, Food Service Administrator and Assistant Administrator and Foremans and THREE ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATORS OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERIC WATKINS
Demario Roberts, et al v. Stephen Sinclair, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35846
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC ASKREN, in his individual capacity as Head Chaplain of the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, in his individual capacity as Superintendent of the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections, ROSE, Sgt.; in his individual capacity as Sergeant at the Washington State Reformatory of the Monroe Correctional Complex of the Washington Department of Corrections and others
Defendant: ROBERT HERZOG, ASIN, Lt., BEA BLOWERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAIM LAO, Inmate #400248, JEREMY LIVINGSTON, Inmate #381036, MOHAMED MOHAMED, Inmate# 384454 and others
Shabazz v. Holliday et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02514
Defendant: Cundiff, Mitchel Holliday, Food Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff: Sabir Shabazz
Interested Party: TO THE CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Sabir Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Watson v. Gus Christo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2737
Defendant / Appellee: GUS CHRISTO, Chaplain, JAMES SCARBOROUGH, Deputy Warden, MICHAEL KNIGHT, Food Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID M. WATSON
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019ct03173
Defendant: Counselor Shaffer, Chaplain Langston, Food Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff: Lonnie Bernard Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. United States, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3047
Defendant: (FNU) CLARK, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN/JANE DOES, Unit Team or Other, in their individual and official capacities, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director of the Federal Burea of Prisons, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF PRISONS, WITT, Correctional Officer, USP-Leavenworth, in her indiviudal and official capacity, LIONHART, Special Investigation Service, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS
Mark Weiss v. P. Shurpit, et al
as 18-2042
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK A. WEISS
Defendant - Appellee: P. SHURPIT and DOC FOOD SERVICE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
Asher Backer v. Brent Carney, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35373
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASHER JAMES BACKER
Defendant - Appellee: BRENT CARNEY, WA DOC State Dietician, BELINDA STEWART, WA DOC Religious Programs Manager, RICHARD ROBERTS, SCCC Correctional Sgt and others
Booker v. Graham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-739
Plaintiff: Jamaine Porter, Earnest Stokes, Paul Colon and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Amin B. Booker, AKA Amin Booker
Defendant - Appellee: Harold D. Graham, Superintendent; Auburn Correctional Facility, Grafton Robinson, Deputy Superintendent of Security at Auburn Correctional Facility, Captain Fagan and others
Defendant: Justin Thomas, Deputy Superintendent of Programs at Auburn Correctional Facility, #2 John Doe, Correctional Officer; Auburn Correctional Facility, #3 John Doe, Correctional Officer; Auburn Correctional Facility and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?