Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foote v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv02603
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Foote
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Woodmont Co Inc v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
as 5:2022cv01579
Counter Defendant:
Woodmont Co Inc
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Foot Locker Retail Inc
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail Inc doing business as Champs Sports doing business as Foot Locker
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pierre Bossier Mall L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tate v. Total Foot Care
as 22-60143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Angela Tate, Darshaun Young, Dena Myers and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Total Foot Care, at its various locations if operating as Total Foot Care
Foote v. Collier et al
as 1:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Billy Foote
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, R Chambers and H M Pederson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
FILING ERROR
as 5:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alejandro Mendoza
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Smith v. Matrix Minds, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Smith
Defendant:
Matrix Minds, LLC, d/b/a Cloud 9 Vapo Shop, Carl Foote and Matrix Minds, LLC doing business as Cloud 9 Vapo Shop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Ray et al
as 4:2021cv00811
Defendant:
Magistrate Hal R. Ray, Jr., Judge Elizabeth Erny Foote, Mary C. Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
NaKisha Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
