Cases 31 - 40 of 7,906
Lagrange v. Eagle, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Irma Lee Legrange and Irma Lee Lagrange
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Eagle, Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience Inc., Paramount Global, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Uniroyal Holding, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Butler et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2022cv00963
Defendant:
BWDAC, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Butler and Kathy Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10327
Defendant:
Carrier Corporation, Fort Kent Holdings, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
HBW Industries, Inc., Riley Power Inc., The Marley-Wylain Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John S. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al.
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
HAMISH WILLIAMS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES and HAMISH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC., INDUCTOTHERM CORPORATION, LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Craig v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Redco Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant:
Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant:
Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
