Cases 51 - 60 of 46,465
MEZ Corp. v. Cacciato et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
MEZ Corp.
Defendant:
Mathew Cacciato, Frank Cacciato, Katherine Cacciato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hallmark Spclt v. Frank Winston Crum
as 24-40270
Plaintiff:
Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Frank Winston Crum Insurance and Cannon Cochran Management Services, Incorporated
Thompson v. City of New York
as 24-1051
Plaintiff:
EON THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Mayor of New York City, CYNTHIA BRANN, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Correction and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Taylor v. Peone et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Brandon Peone, Andre Johnson, Chris Brun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kenneth Walker v. National Property Board, et al
as 24-7061
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walker
Defendant:
National Property Board, Andreas Ten Berge, Urlika Frank and others
(PS) Dayton v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Dayton
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Nathan Strickland, Frank Piro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
