Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Berkowitz et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01438
Plaintiff: JEROME JAY BERKOWITZ, GREGORY ALLEN AKERVIK, ANGELA ALBERTSON and others
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Doe v. City of Springtown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant: City of Springtown, Springtown Independent School District and Frank Carroll
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parr et al v. Directv, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv03424
Defendant: Directv, LLC, Multiband Field Services, Inc., Multiband Corp. and others
Plaintiff: Steven Parr , Jeffery Adams , Todd Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Darryl Cain v. Frank Carroll, et al
as 16-2463
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL CAIN
Defendant - Appellee: FRANK CARROLL, Sergeant - Detroit Police Department and CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv07229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Cain v. Carroll We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv10525
Plaintiff: Darryl Cain
Defendant: Frank Carroll
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Khan v. Carroll
as 4:2012cv00841
Plaintiff: Muhammad A Khan
Defendant: Frank Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Khan v. Carroll
as 4:2012mc00129
Plaintiff: Muhammad A Khan
Defendant: Frank Carroll
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61810
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?