Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62935
Plaintiff:
JESSE FRANK MORGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Morgan v. J. Tincher
as 21-2060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. TINCHER, individually and in his official capacity and OFFICER KEVIN CONLEY, individually and in his official capacity
Defendant:
LOGAN COUNTY COMMISSION, A West Virginia county government, LOGAN COUNTY SHERIFF SONYA M. DINGESS-PORTER, individually and in her official capacity, DEPUTY BARRY MYNES, individually and in his official capacity and others
Morgan v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv05915
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frank Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frank Morgan v. Frank Lawrence
as 19-1927
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK LAWRENCE
Morgan v. Lashbrook
as 3:2019cv00209
Petitioner:
Frank Morgan
Respondent:
Jacqueline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. Logan County Commission et al
as 2:2018cv01450
Defendant:
Officer J. D. Tincher, Logan County Sheriff Sonya M. Dingess-Porter, Logan County Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Rauner
as 3:2018cv01206
Plaintiff:
Frank Morgan
Defendant:
Bruce Rauner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Morgan v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 17-2569
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00730
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
