Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Parker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Christopher Frank Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PARKER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2021cv10421
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK PARKER, JR.
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilbeck et al v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
as 1:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Edward Frank Parker and Julie Frank Wilbeck
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. Bourdon, et al
as 19-4124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SWAT TEAM, KRISTIE BOURDON, CURTIS L. GARNER and others
Parker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01387
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frank Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Bourdon et al
as 2:2018cv00688
Defendant:
Sean Reyes, Curis L. Garner, Kristie Bourdon and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Parker et al v. Prince Telecom, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv01536
Defendant:
Jeremy Bubenicek, Does and Prince Telecom, LLC
Plaintiff:
Frank Parker
Parker et al v. General Motors, LLC
as NYS/1:15-cv-09538
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert George Parker , Charles Lewis Parker , John W Parker and others
Parker et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2015cv09538
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert George Parker , Charles Lewis Parker , John W Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irvin v. Mr. Irvin Enterprises et al
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Mr. Irvin Enterprises, Brian Kemp, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
