Cases 61 - 70 of 164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Darrick Harold Meeks, Sr.
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Franklin County Sheriffs Office, Franklin County District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Shine v. Ricky Jones, et al
as 18-40533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT EVERETT SHINE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY JONES, Franklin County Sheriff, JOHN DOES, Unknown Agents of the Franklin County Sheriff Department and HEATH HYDE, Surety
Boston v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 2:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Boston
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage , Franklin County Sheriff and Bethany L. Suttinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Normand v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2018ct03037
Petitioner:
Otto Gary Normand
Respondent:
Chloe Anne Reynolds, Kristen W. Peebles, T. Allen Buzzy Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Franklin County Sheriff
as 2:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Isaac Castile, III
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Shine, et al v. Ricky Jones, et al
as 18-40156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT EVERETT SHINE and JOSEPH HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY JONES, Franklin County Sheriff and HEATH ENIX HYDE, Surety
NORMAND v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
OTTO GARY NORMAND
Defendant:
CHLOE ANNE REYNOLDS, KRISTEN W. PEEBLES, T. ALLEN "BUZZY&quo GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvan v. Franklin County Sheriff Department
as 2:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Arturo Galvan
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff Department and Bureau of Alcohol, Tabacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Fritz et al
as 2:2017cv00688
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowen
Defendant:
Brian G. Fritz , Franklin County Sheriff's Office and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
