Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Charlie Hardin v. Tobias Turley
as 24-7021
Defendant:
JAMES E. PIERCE, CASE MANAGER MOORE, CASE MANAGER BAZZLE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Friedmann v. Franklin Pierce Public Schools, et al.
as 24-6089
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, CHRIS REYKDAL, Superintendent, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER FRIEDMANN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin Pierce School District No. 402 v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03709
Plaintiff:
Franklin Pierce School District No. 402
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1071 Higher Education Act 1965
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv08638
Plaintiff:
Franklin Pierce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
FANNING v. FRANKLIN PIERCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2015cv00935
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
FRANKLIN PIERCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
EICHELBERGER et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2014cv07094
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN PIERCE EICHELBERGER and DOLORES EICHELBERGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
