Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Young v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
as 4:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Regina Young
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whitley et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45598
Plaintiff:
Roxie Whitley , Chris Denson , Diane Denson and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharma Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitley et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv02290
Plaintiff:
Roxie Whitley , Chris Denson , Diane Denson and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maye v. Fred's Inc et al
as 7:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Geneva Maye
Defendant:
Fred's Inc , Fred's Super Dollar, Eutaw Drug Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matlock v. Boyd et al
as 4:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
Glen Matlock
Defendant:
Lloyd Boyd and Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leblanc v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01002
Plaintiff:
Mary Moore Leblanc
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Mattie Perry
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watlington v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
as 3:2016cv03565
Plaintiff:
Claretta Watlington
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZRM v. Hoop et al
as 3:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
ZRM
Defendant:
Jerry Hoop , Bobby Savage, Fred's, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Fred's Stores of Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Sharon Peters
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Mississippi, Inc. and Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
