Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,772
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant: SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman (PS) v. Epps et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff: Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant: Elizabeth (I) Epps, Elizabeth Epps and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Joe Freeman
as 24-1917
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Joe Freeman
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff: Kyle Freeman
Defendant: Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner: Maurice Freeman
Respondent: Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
E.M., by his guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski et al v. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00288
Defendant: Robin Brown, Robin Freeman and Crystal Brake
Plaintiff: E.M., by his guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski, K.M., by her guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski, H.M., by her guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Chenoweth
as 24-5050
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FREEMAN DAVID CHENOWETH, JR.
United States v. Chenoweth
as 24-5051
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FREEMAN DAVID CHENOWETH, JR.
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant: Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman Hill v. Polycorp Trust Company et al
as 2:2024cv01663
Plaintiff: Freeman Hill
Defendant: Polycorp Trust Company, Custodian FBO Ira J. Boren, Brian Boren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?