Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Global Paycard Corporation v. Onecom, LLC
as 1:2023cv22744
Plaintiff:
Global Paycard Corporation doing business as Kittrell Paycard
Defendant:
Onecom LLC, My Fast Funds LLC, Rocket One Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
PARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07641
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS G. PARKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Parks et al
as 2:2021cv12676
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald G. Parks and Madeline M. Parks
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Tolentino v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc, et al
as 1:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Sally Tolentino, Sally B. Tolentino and Tino Tolentino
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii, G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Payton v. Kelly, et al
as 21-3088
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANAEL S. TIMM, Mailroom Clerk/Officer, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his official professional and non-professional individual capacities, HUTCHINSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Mailroom, in its official professional and non-professional capacities, D. CLAY VANHOOSE, Major, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his official professional and non-professional individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER ALMON PAYTON, AKA Walter Peyton, Inc.
Parks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00777
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathleen G Parks and Billy Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payton (ID 66352) v. Kelly et al
as 5:2020cv03257
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton and Walter Peyton, Inc.
Defendant:
Alec R. Wilson, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, Nathanael S. Timm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
