Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brooks et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv06458
Plaintiff:
Adrian Brooks, Alejandro N. Reyes, Alice Llaneras and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Samuel v. Babcock
as 1:2021cv00600
Defendant:
Lewis T. Babcock
Plaintiff:
Alliston G. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel v. Brooks et al
as 1:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Tracy Brooks, c/o Dietze and Davis, P.C., Denver Rescue Mission, The and others
Plaintiff:
Alliston G. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Doe et al
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jaun Trevino, G Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Burke v. T. Bowns, et al
as 14-15484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN G. BURKE
Defendant - Appellee:
T. BOWNS, W. TIDWELL, G. SAMUELS and others
Rourke v. Holt et al
as 1:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Donald Rourke
Defendant:
Raymond Holt, Constance Reese, Joseph Savidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Bowns et al
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Stephen G Burke
Defendant:
T Bowns, W Tidwell, G Samuels and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA, Ex Rel et al v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv00321
Defendant:
Ryan Barry, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Susan H. Black and others
Plaintiff:
Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott and USA, Ex Rel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rourke v. Holt et al
as 1:2010cv01291
Plaintiff:
Donald Rourke
Defendant:
Raymond Holt, Constance Reese, Joseph Savidge and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Johns et al
as 2:2007cv00607
Plaintiff:
Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jack E. Johns and Jack G. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Property Damage (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
