Cases 1 - 10 of 93,235
A.G. v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2024at00584
Plaintiff:
A. G.
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou, Jennifer Moody and Children First Foster Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAH v. TURNER III et al
as 3:2024cv05988
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05978
Plaintiff:
ALICE G. WOODEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nuno et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nuno and Andrea G. Rubio Jimenez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Giragos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
John G. Giragos, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOPES v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
JEFF G LOPES
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
