Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Adams v. Middlesex County, et al
as 2:2020cv02112
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Mathew Johnson, Crossmark, Daniel H Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Raghnal et al
as 2:2020cv01982
Defendant:
Harriet E Raghnal, Dave Monroe, Rebecca L Burton and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe et al v. Zucker et al
as 1:2020cv00840
Plaintiff:
Jane Joe, Jane Boe, Sr., Childrens Health Defense and others
Defendant:
Randall Squier, David P. Bennardo, New York State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Grimes et al
as 3:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
Alison Lundergan Grimes, Mary Sue Helm, Albert B. Chandler, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francisco J. Neri Quiroga et al v. Adams Property Management Co., LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05878
Defendant:
Lawrence G Adams, Adams Property Management Co., LLC, Adams Three Sisters, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Montelongo Barrera, A G N.M., G J N.M. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sued In Their Official And Individual Capacities Pursuant To 42 U.S.C. § 1983:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.