Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Williams v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Washington, Todd Ball, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Ball et al
as 4:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Todd Ball, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demond White v. George Schaefer, Jr.
as 21-7248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE SCHAEFER, JR., III, NICOLE E. JANICKI, Detective, NPD (31043), CHRISTOPHER W. ROCCIO, Detective, NPD (29301) and others
EVANS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
THERESA G. EVANS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Evans v. Hinthorne
as 2:2021cv02040
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Petitioner:
Terry G Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Unknown
as 1:2021cv00164
Defendant:
John Doe, Roman C. Santa Domingo, Nicole E. Janicki and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Antione White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demond White v. Thurman Livingston
as 21-6072
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY JANE HALL, Norfolk Circuit Court Judge, THERESE C. MOYNIHAM, Forensic Scientist, PHILIP G. EVANS, II, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Evans v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2020cv00526
Petitioner:
Audley G Evans, II
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Livingston et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
Jamal Vinson, Jay'Quan Cobb, Demetrius Branch and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Antionei White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Evans v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
as 20-13458
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner:
RALPH G. EVANS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
