Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 3:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
Williams N. Nettles, B. Obama, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv00616
Defendant:
Michael L. Abston, J. Aldrick, Tamara L. Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heaps et al v. Clinton et al
as 3:2011cv01069
Plaintiff:
Karen Heaps and Jessica Birk
Defendant:
Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2008cv00915
Petitioner:
Jan P. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Harry M. Reid, John Ensign and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 9:2007cv01218
Petitioner:
Jan Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael Mukasey, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Warden Hudson, et al.
as 1:2007cv00031
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Peter Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 6:2007cv06315
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A. Fiatal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jan F. Becker
Defendant:
Hudson, G.W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007hc02109
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart Hudson, Virginia Lameneck, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
