Cases 1 - 10 of 825
Stokes v. Garnett
as 1:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Charles Stokes
Defendant:
Jason Garnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Garnett v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Garnett
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, Meijer, Inc., Meijer Companies, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jarett v. Garnett, Kansas, City of, et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reese Jarett and Reese Jarett
Defendant:
Garnett, Kansas, City of, Anderson County, Kansas, Les McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02703
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. and Shauntee Garnett
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Doe v. Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. (Praxis) et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. (Praxis) and Shauntee Garnett
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of Marshall, Texas
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
City of Marshall, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
