Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McCartney v. Arnott
as 24-4001
Petitioner:
TAYLOR, FKA Gary Taylor Kruitbosch, AKA Nigel Snookeroo McCartney
Respondent:
JIM ARNOTT
Warren v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Rahmel Warren
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Chief Duty Gary Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary et al v. Kemp et al
as 4:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marion Zachary and Michael Burriss
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Wilcher, Chief Deputy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCartney v. Arnott
as 1:2022cv00072
Petitioner:
Nigel S. McCartney, Taylor, Nigel Snookeroo McCartney and others
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. TDCJ-CID Director
as 5:2020cv00118
Petitioner:
Albert Gary Taylor
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Halbert v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Rich Wills, Ricky D Forbus, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Halbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laymance v. Shourd et al
as 4:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dean Laymance
Defendant:
Ricky Shourd, Paul Hofstead, Ricky Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Shourd et al
as 4:2017cv00305
Defendant:
Ricky Shourd, Paul Hofstead, Ricky Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Lynn Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Shourd et al
as 4:2017cv00306
Defendant:
Ricky Shourd, Paul Hofstead, Ricky Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lynn Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Chappius et al
as 1:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Amin Booker
Defendant:
Paul Chappius, Jr., Gary Taylor, Daniel F. Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
