Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown #712722 v. LeBarre et al
as 1:2020cv00545
Defendant:
Unknown Davids, Jody Lebarre, Unknown Gaskill and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown #712722
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beal #327749 v. Doolittle et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Defendant:
Unknown Gaskill, Jody Lebarre and Nicole Doolittle
Plaintiff:
Latavious Beal #327749
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE v. THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2020cv00117
Defendant:
ROB GASKILL, THE INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GASKILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93966
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN GASKILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASKILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79835
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON GASKILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMART v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2019cv21622
Defendant:
REX UTUK, MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN, TIM GASKILL and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perles et al v. Drennan et al
as 1:2019cv10690
Plaintiff:
Perles Law Firm, P.C., Steven R. Perles and Fay and Perles FSIA Litigation Partnership
Defendant:
Dan Gaskill, Patrick Donahue, Joseph Peter Drennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Department of Children and Families v. Thelisma et al
as 2:2019cv14415
Plaintiff:
Department of Children and Families
Defendant:
Carmelo Etienne, Sophia Thelisma and Suzanne Gaskill
Counter Defendant:
Tiffany Perry, Tim Slavens, Ashley Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
