Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Abeome Corporation Inc. v. J. Stevens, et al
as 24-10094
Plaintiff:
ABEOME CORPORATION INC.
Defendant:
J. HAMPTON STEVENS, LISA L. TORBETT and GEORGE CAMPBELL
Campbell v. Warden
as 1:2023cv05585
Petitioner:
George Campbell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01486
Petitioner:
George Campbell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
as 1:2022cv01411
Petitioner:
George Campbell
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Warden
as 1:2022cv07744
Petitioner:
George Campbell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ABEOME CORPORATION INC v. STEVENS et al
as 3:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
ABEOME CORPORATION INC. and ABEOME CORPORATION INC
Defendant:
J. HAMPTON STEVENS, LISA L TORBETT, GEORGE CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klaskin v. The MITRE Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11452
Plaintiff:
Jill Klaskin
Defendant:
The MITRE Corporation, MITRE Board of Trustees, Jason Providakes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United States of America v. Williams (Campbell)
as 20-4204
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anderson King, AKA Hasan Abdul-Malik, Najimah Abdul Cox, Craig Williams and others
Defendant / Appellant:
George Campbell, AKA Roland Campell, AKA Ramadan
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92225
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
