Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Riggins v. Georgia-Pacific Brewton LLC
as 1:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
James Riggins
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Brewton LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04593
Plaintiff:
William Rivera
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC and Georgia-Pacific Corrugated IV LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franco v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 4:2021cv02097
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Inc. Koch Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Ariana Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01474
Defendant:
Jack Doe, US Metal Works Inc, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. McKinney Drilling, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00268
Defendant:
Phil Andrews, McKinney Drilling, LLC, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tyree Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tallman, Jr. v. Georgia-Pacific LLC
as 3:2019cv00468
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tallman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medlin et al v. Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01010
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Medlin, III and Krissten Medlin
Defendant:
John Does, 1-5 and Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC and John Does, 1-5
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, John Doe and Swing Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Licht v. Georgia Pacific Gypsum, LLC
as 3:2019cv03005
Plaintiff:
Scott H Licht
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Gypsum, LLC and Georgia Pacific Gypsum LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
