Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Johnson et al v. Lidl US LLC et al
as 6:2023cv05817
Plaintiff:
Gina Johnson and Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Lidl US LLC, Lidl US Operations LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14532
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Gary Palmer, Gaurav Jha and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dylan Higgins et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04994
Plaintiff:
Holly Kane, Dylan Higgins, Jodie Hill and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Higgins et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Holly Kane, Dylan Higgins, Jodie Hill and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Higgins et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00802
Plaintiff:
Higgins, Holly Kane, Dylan Higgins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
GINA JOHNSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Richardson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dean Naylor, C.J. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Silas Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dean Naylor, C.J. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Silas Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
