Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez v. Moghe et al
as 1:2026cv02546
Defendant:
James C. Weaver, Dr. Prabhas V. Moghe, Dr. Gene Fitch and others
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Olivares Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01186
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez v. Lane
as 6:2026cv04048
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ledesma Gutierrez
Defendant:
Municipal Judge Jennifer F Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
FILING ERROR
as 1:2026cv02544
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Olivares Gutierrez
Defendant:
Dr. Prabhas V. Moghe, Dr. Gene Fitch, Dr. Amanda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv02637
Plaintiff:
Omar Gutierrez
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gutierrez v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv10475
Plaintiff:
Jose Gutierrez
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00596
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gutierrez v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv05358
Plaintiff:
Juan Gutierrez
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
