Cases 1 - 10 of 15
In Re: Cleveland Brothers Data Incident Litigation
as 1:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Randy Thomas, Gabrielle Thomas and Robert MacMichael
Defendant:
Cleveland Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08109
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Thomas
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rensch v. Farner et al
as 1:2021cv02895
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Thomas Rensch
Defendant:
Calvin Farner, Alison Vincent-Beckman, Christian Boodoosingh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $6,614.00 IN U.S. Currency
as 2:2020cv00275
Defendant:
$6,614.00 in US Currency
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Claimant:
Gabriel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Thomas v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05987
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eden v. Bradley County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv00217
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Bradley County, Tennessee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MGM Resorts International et al v. Acosta et al
as 2:2018cv01288
Defendant:
Whtiney Day, Treza Mekhail, Chad Packard and others
Plaintiff:
Mandalay Bay, LLC f/k/a Mandalay Corp., MGM Resorts International, Mandalay Resort Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING USA et al v. Mr. SIGHTSEEING, LLC., ET AL.
as 1:2014cv00820
Plaintiff:
OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING USA, INC. and CITY SIGHTSEEING WASHINGTON, D.C., INC.
Defendant:
MR. SIGHTSEEING, LLC. , ANDERS NIELSEN , GABRIEL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
