Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Murray v. USA
as 3:2019cv01137
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Murray and Greg Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murray-Bell et al v. NCL (BAHAMAS), LTD.
as 1:2017cv24059
Plaintiff:
Gary Murray-Bell and Wendy Murray-Bell
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS), LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-20678
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard Laverne Brown , Jacqueline G. Hill , Delphine Murray Williams and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Adams v. David Osborne, et al
as 13-5447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF NANCE, officially as CC3 and individually, RUSTY HALL, officially as Classification Coordinator and individually, DEAN HALL, officially as Disciplinary Board Chairman and individually and others
Adams v. Osborne et al
as 3:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Adams
Defendant:
David Osborne, Gary Murray, Jeff Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01975
Plaintiff:
Gary Murray
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc., Keystone RV Company and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
