Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Angelly et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-00764
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Angelly and Gary Angelly Farms
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Angelly et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00764
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Angelly and Gary Angelly Farms
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neal et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02274
Plaintiff:
Sandra Neal and Gary Neal
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv10605
Plaintiff:
Pamela Neal and Gary Neal
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sadler v. Arnone
as 3:2012cv01244
Petitioner:
Gary Neal Sadler
Respondent:
Leo C. Arnone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woolbright v. Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Woolbright
Defendant:
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sadler v. Schaefer et al
as 3:2012cv00827
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Sadler
Defendant:
Daniel Schaefer, Peter Murphy, Timothy Silvis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL et al v. ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv01925
Plaintiff:
GARY NEAL and MICHELLE NEAL
Defendant:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sadler v. Strange et al
as 3:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Sadler
Defendant:
Mark Strange and Peter Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddington v. Sumner et al
as 1:2009cv02612
Plaintiff:
Gary Neal Weddington
Defendant:
Kenneth Sumner and Steve Robert Rotella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
