Cases 1 - 10 of 834
Gaskins v. City of Bainbridge Island
as 2:2025cv00016
Defendant:
City of Bainbridge Island
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Gaskins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joseph Miner v. City of Desert Hot Springs, California et al
as 8:2024cv02793
Defendant:
City of Desert Hot Springs, California, Doe Defendants, Tuan Anh Vu and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaskins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv04572
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kandy Gaskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Gaskins v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7164
Petitioner:
JOHN CORNELIUS GASKINS
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Humphrey v. Gaskins
as 9:2024cv06868
Plaintiff:
Barbara Humphrey
Defendant:
James Alfred Gaskins, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Matthews Gaskins v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv06455
Defendant:
3M Company, The Chemours Company FC LLC, Dowdupont Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matthews Gaskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCNEW v. BARRS et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Defendant:
SPRING, JOHN DOE, BENGYEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCNEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Weiztzel v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv02999
Defendant:
B. Johnson and D. Gaskins
Plaintiff:
Danielle Marie Weiztzel and Danielle Marie Weitzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
