Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Blakes v. Vespa et al
as 1:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Rev Blakes
Defendant:
John P Vespa, Dave Gast, Brenda McCavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Gast
as 1:2023cv01338
Petitioner:
Torlando Dontae McDonald
Respondent:
David Gast
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Gast
as 1:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
Torlando Dontae McDonald
Defendant:
David Gast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Werry v. Gast et al
as 3:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jason Werry
Defendant:
Courtney Gast, Clark, Josh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Hoos et al
as 1:2021cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ronnie B Nelson
Defendant:
Jodi Hoos, Dave Gast, Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyatt v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Respondent:
Don Gast, Ann Benjamin, Rodney G. Hasty and others
Petitioner:
Terry Alvin Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian v. Knox County Detention Ctr et al
as 3:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
Clarence Reed Julian
Defendant:
CPL Hanley, Knox County Detention Ctr and C.O. Gast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Amburgey et al
as 1:2019cv00026
Defendant:
J. Thomas Amburgey, Fredilyn Sison, Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ashe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
