Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 625
Geary v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Kimberly Geary
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GEARY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00631
Petitioner: DENNIS GEARY
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Geary v. Coinbase Gobal, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: Shaun Geary
Defendant: Coinbase Inc. and Toshi Holdings Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01738
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Walton v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1051
Petitioner: GEARY WAYNE WALTON
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff: J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant: Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Upneet Dhaliwal et al v. Joseph Komrosky et al
as 5:2023cv02605
Plaintiff: Upneet Dhaliwal and Julie Geary
Defendant: Joseph Komrosky, Temecula Valley Unified School District Board and Temecula Valley Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00689
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geary v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv15972
Plaintiff: Cori Ann Geary
Defendant: Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?