Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Teachers Insurance Company v. Purcell et al
as 6:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
Teachers Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tami Purcell, Mike Hall, Tammy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hamilton v. Reed et al
as 1:2010cv01186
Plaintiff:
Fredric A. Hamilton
Defendant:
Gerald Milton Reed , Woody Cook , Timothy Bunch and others
Miscellaneou:
Harry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnette et al v. Grizzly Processing, LLC et al
as 7:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Susan Barnette , Hollie Blanton , Warren Blanton and others
Defendant:
Grizzly Processing, LLC and Frasure Creek Mining, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GLASS, JR et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2009cv66148
Plaintiff:
GENE DAVIS GLASS, JR and RENEE BRYANT GLASS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gene Davis Glass, Jr., et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as SC/8:09-CV-00590
Plaintiff:
Gene Davis Glass, Jr
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Glass et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Gene Davis Glass, Jr and Renee Bryant Glass
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00447
Petitioner:
Alfred Gene Davis
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00037
Petitioner:
Alfred Gene Davis
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buck v. Bench
as 2:2008cv00581
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen Buck
Defendant:
Russell W. Bench, Darwin C. Hansen, Gene Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. SSA
as 6:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gene Davis
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
