Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Scott v. United States Government
as 2:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott, II v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration and Arizona Automotive Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. Phoenix Municipal Court et al
as 2:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Phoenix Municipal Court, Maricopa, County of, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Scott v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2021cv02050
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2021cv00871
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott II v. USA
as 4:2021cv00281
Defendant:
United States Government and USA
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Albertson's Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Megellan Behavioral Health, Tolleson Police Department, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Scott, II v. Thomas Nelson's Bible Industry
as 20-16097
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELSON'S BIBLE INDUSTRY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
