Cases 1 - 10 of 552
New Concept Energy, Inc. v. Gentile
as 24-1002
Plaintiff:
NEW CONCEPT ENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
GUY GENTILE and MINTBROKER INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Avalon Holdings Corporation v. Gentile
as 24-999
Plaintiff:
AVALON HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Defendant:
GUY GENTILE, MINTBROKER INTERNATIONAL, LTD. and JOHN DOES 1 THRU 10
Pastificio Gentile S.r.l. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Pastificio Gentile S.r.l.
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rosenberg et al v. Gentile
as 1:2024cv10167
Plaintiff:
David Rosenberg, The Rosenberg Family Nominee Trust and The Rosenberg Family Nominee Trust/Sawdran
Defendant:
David Gentile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Solomon v. Gentile et al.
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
LaJena Solomon
Defendant:
Robert Gentile, Hannah Short and City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC
as 23-8035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
GPB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ASCENDANT CAPITAL, LLC, ASCENDANT ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID GENTILE
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC
as 23-8010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
GPB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ASCENDANT ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES, LLC and JEFFREY LASH
Defendant / Appellant:
ASCENDANT CAPITAL, LLC, JEFFRY SCHNEIDER and DAVID GENTILE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
