Cases 11 - 20 of 125
(SS)Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jackson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv01702
Petitioner:
George Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George Anthony Hernandez v. Ronald J. Broomfield
as 2:2022cv02592
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04638
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ANTHONY COLLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00327
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dornellas v. Schmidt
as 2:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
Brian Dornellas
Defendant:
George Anthony Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
George Anthony Hernandez v. Ronald J. Broomfield
as 5:2021cv01847
Petitioner:
George Anthony Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2021cv00134
Petitioner:
George Anthony Lewis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spence v. Crawford
as 1:2021cv00833
Petitioner:
George Anthony Spence
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
