Cases 1 - 10 of 25
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27259
Plaintiff:
GERALD KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Lexington Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv00283
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mariann Torressen, Gerald King and Raymond Torressen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Murfreesboro, Tennessee (Rutherford County) et al
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Murfreesboro, Tennessee (Rutherford County) and Rutherford County City Government
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Gerald King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32219
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ELTON GERALD KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Niblack et al v.Mud Cab Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv08091
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Niblack , Gerald King and Julie Hotchkiss
Defendant:
Mud Cab Corp., Azat E. Serikbayev and Gerges Y Botros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
King et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerald King and Allison King
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33857
Plaintiff:
Veronica King and Gerald King, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Gerald King v. Regence Blue Cross and Blue Shield et al
as 2:2013cv00939
Plaintiff:
Estate of Gerald King
Defendant:
Regence Blue Cross and Blue Shield and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reginald Mimms v. J. Grondolsky
as 12-6947
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King
Respondent - Appellee:
J. GRONDOLSKY, Warden
US v. Reginald Mimm
as 12-6503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGINALD MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
