Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Godbolt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Godbolt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Godbolt v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Calvin Godbolt
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davidson et al v. Godbolt et al
as 5:2023cv06116
Plaintiff:
Hubert Denver Davidson and Bridget Davidson
Defendant:
Wyndel Antwain Godbolt and TMD Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
INGRAM, JR. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv24058
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. INGRAM, JR.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Centurion of Florida, L.L.C., Ronald Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Godbolt
as 23-11073
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Harold Godbolt
Godbolt v. AFAM Concept, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv06667
Plaintiff:
Khyana Godbolt
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jaylin Godbolt v. Warren Montgomery
as 23-55638
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAYLIN KEMONE GODBOLT
Respondent / Appellee:
WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, Warden
Godbolt v. Tampa Police Department et al
as 8:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Avery Tyrone Godbolt
Defendant:
Tampa Police Department and Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godbolt v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Arthur Godbolt
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
