Cases 51 - 60 of 1,445
Wilson (PS) v. Rollo et al
as 1:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Terance DeJuan Wilson
Defendant:
Rollo, BVCF Warden, Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Goins
as 23-5848
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GOINS
David Meyers v. Mr. Honeycut
as 23-6931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. HONEYCUTT, Alexander Correctional Institute Warden, FARRISH, Unit Manager, TIMOTHY METCALF and others
Porter v. Fraley et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Porter, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Fraley, Matt Patterson, Steve Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03437
Plaintiff:
QUINTEN GOINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goins v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Co.
as 1:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Estella Goins
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GOINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
TIAWUAN DEMETRIUS GOINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
ERICK GOINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GOINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24219
Plaintiff:
Kristina Anne Goins
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
