Cases 21 - 30 of 395
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lotstein et al v. Southern First Bancshares Inc et al
as 6:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Alina Rose Lotstein and John Grant
Defendant:
Southern First Bancshares Inc, Truist Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00818
In Re:
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Lee, Keaira Gamble, Jenny Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
State of Oklahoma et al v. Tellez et al
as 7:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma, John M O'Connor and Steve Kunzweiler
Defendant:
Heriberto Tellez, Collete S Peters, S R Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Grant v. Baker
as 22-8068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES A. BAKER, III
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Nouvel, LLC v. Mondo Bongo, LLC, et al
as 22-55737
Not Classified By Court:
In re: EX PARTE APPLICATION OF NOUVEL, LLC, For an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery from Mondo Bongo, LLC, William Bradley Pitt, and Warren Grant for Use in Foreign Proceedings
Petitioner:
NOUVEL, LLC
Respondent:
MONDO BONGO, LLC, WILLIAM BRADLEY PITT and WARREN GRANT
Grant v. Baker
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
James A Baker, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
